Contraceptive methods as an alternative to the pill are increasingly becoming a focus for many women. Those who have taken hormonal contraceptives for years are familiar with potential side effects: headaches, mood swings, weight gain, general malaise, or skin problems . The risk factors associated with taking the pill increase, especially after the age of 40. It's no wonder, then, that interest in hormone-free contraceptive methods is growing— methods that respect the menstrual cycle without permanently interfering with the hormonal balance.

The answer depends on what a woman* expects from her contraception . Is it about maximum safety , minimal effort, or avoiding hormones altogether, as with the birth control pill? These contraceptives have proven effective:

• Condoms : protect against pregnancy and also against sexually transmitted infections. The disadvantage: they must be used every time you have sex .
• Copper IUD : a long-term solution that remains in the body for several years. Convenient, but associated with the risk of heavier bleeding and subsequent iron deficiency. Insertion is also painful and may require minor surgery.
• Sterilization : offers a very high level of safety , as it is a permanent procedure. For women* who are certain they no longer want pregnancies and have completed their family planning, this can be an alternative. However, the method is permanent and not easily reversible.
• The symptothermal method relies on observing bodily signs such as basal body temperature and the quality of cervical mucus . When used correctly, it offers a high degree of reliability – entirely without hormones.

Alternative to the pill: Many women* choose the symptothermal method because it is independent, cost-effective and free from hormonal burdens .

Alternative to the pill – the advantages:

• Contraception without hormones , no hormonal side effects
• Flexible application , tailored to the individual cycle
• greater awareness of one's own body

But there are also disadvantages:

• Daily measurements require discipline
• The risk increases when days are missed and ovulation is incorrectly determined.
• Additional contraception is needed during the fertile days.
  
  

Alternative to the pill: Natural contraceptive methods are therefore not a "side solution". The methods work if users take them seriously and implement them correctly.

Not every woman wants to measure or monitor her temperature daily. For some, condoms are the simplest solution, for others the copper IUD . Both are classic alternatives , and both are hormone-free . Condoms are ready to use immediately, while the IUD is effective for years – but requires a medical procedure and has potential drawbacks .

And then there's the digital yet natural approach: the combination of the Ovy app and the Ovy basal thermometer as a contraceptive method . This makes the symptothermal method easy to use, clear, and safe. A modern solution for women* who don't want hormones but also don't want to use pen and paper.

The symptothermal method is considered particularly reliable. This method combines observation of cervical mucus quality with daily basal body temperature measurement. Careful documentation of this data allows for reliable detection of ovulation and clear identification of the fertile window .

Studies show that, when used consistently, this method achieves a level of effectiveness comparable to other hormone-free contraceptives . Errors occur primarily when routines are not followed.

An alternative to the pill: This is where technology comes in. The Ovy basal thermometer allows for precise measurement of body temperature in the morning. The readings are automatically transferred to the Ovy app , which detects changes in the cycle and distinguishes between fertile and infertile days .

This reduces the risk of misinterpretations. Users don't have to keep tables or compare curves themselves – the app takes care of the evaluation . This makes the method of contraception significantly easier to use in everyday life and, for many, truly practical.

A method is considered healthy if it doesn't place unnecessary strain on the body . For many, this means hormone-free contraception based on natural processes. The symptothermal method fulfills this requirement – ​​it avoids interfering with the hormonal balance and thus prevents classic side effects .

Alternatives to the pill: Condoms and copper IUDs are also safe options, each with its own advantages and disadvantages . Ultimately, the best solution depends on personal priorities. For many women*, the Ovy app with the Ovy basal thermometer offers a balance of naturalness, safety , and practicality.

Theory is one thing, practice another. Those who choose the symptothermal method as an alternative to the pill need a certain routine: measuring temperature in the morning, observing the quality of cervical mucus , and recording the data. With the Ovy app and the Ovy basal thermometer, this becomes a clear, digital process.

This allows you to deliberately avoid or consciously plan a pregnancy . Perfect for users who want to avoid hormonal side effects and value high everyday usability. Discover perhaps the most convincing alternative to the pill here!

• Frank-Herrmann, P., Heil, J., Gnoth, C., Toledo, E., Baur, S., Pyper, CM, & Freundl, G. (2007). The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behavior during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study. Human Reproduction, 22(5), 1310-1319.
  
• Manhart, M.D., Duane, M., Lind, A., Sinai, I., & Golden-Tevald, J. (2013). Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: A review of effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy using SORT. Osteopathic Family Physician, 5(1), 2–8.
  
• Grimes, DA, Gallo, MF, Grigorieva, V., Nanda, K., & Schulz, KF (2004). Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception, 65(3), 131–139.
  
• World Health Organization. (2016, updated). Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use. Geneva: WHO.
  
• Cleland, K., Zhu, H., Goldstuck, N., Cheng, L., & Trussell, J. (2012). The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: A systematic review of 35 years of experience. Human Reproduction, 27(7), 1994-2000.
  
• Black, A., Guilbert, E., Costescu, D., Dunn, S., Fisher, W., Kives, S., … Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. (2015). Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4). Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canada, 37(11), 1033-1039.
• Cochrane Collaboration. (2004). Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.